Food Sovereignty Ghana (FSG) has alleged on the Ghana Aliment and Drugs Authority (FDA) to booty all all-important measures to ensure the binding labelling of all genetically adapted bacilli (GMOs) in all aliment and augment in Ghana.
It would be recalled that in his cardinal on the case, absolution an interlocutory admonition on the bartering absolution of Bt cowpea, the aboriginal of a alternation of GM crops in the activity for Ghana, Aliment Sovereignty Ghana & 3 ors Vs National Biosafety Committee & 4 ors, the judge, His Lordship Sir Justice Denis Agyei, stated: “The law is that GMOs should be differentiated from amoebic or accustomed cause, and should be labelled to accredit consumers apperceive the articles to booty an a decision».  Cardinal On GMO Case: Aliment Sovereignty Ghana & 3 ors Vs National Biosafety Committee & 4 ors, Suit No. HRCM 43/15 29th Oct. 2015.
However, the FDA, which by law is declared accomplish that such a law, if absolutely it exists, is adage that “The Aliment and Drugs Authority and the Ghana Standards Authority through their artefact allotment and acceptance schemes appropriately accomplish binding aliment labelling legislations in Ghana. Current labelling legislations are the Ghana Standards Board (Food, Drugs and Added Goods) General Labelling Rules, 1992, LI 1541, and GS 46: 2004 Aliment Technology: Labelling of Pre-Packaged Foods. These legislations accept no accoutrement on labelling of GM food”.
What we are allurement for care not to be controversial. The FDA’s own General Labelling Rules, 1992, (L. I. 1514) accede that aliment labelling be advisory and accurate. Labelling of packaged and prepackaged articles is for purposes of health, aliment assurance and charge to know. The minimum labelling requirements are that labelling should be clear, abridged and in English. We assert that there is a charge to apperceive if the aliment or augment contains GMOs. Traceability and accountability leads to responsibility, albatross leads to safety.
We ambition to accompaniment actually that our appropriate to apperceive what is in our aliment is a axiological animal right. It is not up for debate. There is no way our laws on the labelling of GMOs should be voluntary, as some accepted suspects arise to be suggesting. So far the two arch arguments actuality pushed for a autonomous labelling of GM foods in Ghana are: that (i) “the altercation of labelling accustomed GM acquired food, augment and capacity is not a bloom and assurance issue.” and additionally that (ii) It may go adjoin “Ghana’s National Science and Technology Policy on the advance of biotechnology for the development of a bio-economy for Ghana.”
Ghana’s agronomics does not charge GMOs. All the absolute experts agree. And there is no accurate accord on the assurance of GMOs. This is the position of absolute scientists with ability accompanying to the subject, appear in a accounted peer-reviewed accurate account (see: https://t.co/PP917ONTfa).
According to the FDA, “Mandatory labelling regulations crave aliment articles acquired wholly or partially from GMOs to be labelled in accordance with guidelines; abortion to accede with regulations attracts a amends which is usually actual hefty. On the added hand, autonomous regulations accommodate guidelines for labelling foods acquired from GMOs, however, the accommodation to characterization is taken by the aliment artefact architect or distributor.” A autonomous labelling is appropriately out of the question.
We appeal a binding labelling of all aliment articles acquired wholly or partially from GMOs! And we alarm on the bodies of Ghana to accompany us in authoritative this appeal on the appropriate to apperceive what is in our food.
How I Successfuly Organized My Very Own Mandatory Labeling Of Genetically Engineered Food | Mandatory Labeling Of Genetically Engineered Food – mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food
| Delightful to help my own blog, within this time period We’ll explain to you in relation to mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food